In Trump v. CASA, the Supreme Court significantly narrowed federal courts’ power to issue “universal” or “nationwide” injunctions—broad orders that bar the government from enforcing a policy against ...

The right-wing justices on Thursday were amenable to the Trump administration’s bid to pare back universal injunctions, a type of relief where lower-court judges block government policies for the ...

On June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court held in a 6-3 decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc. that federal courts lack the authority to issue universal injunctions under the Judiciary Act of 1789. In so ...

On January 23, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the federal government’s request to stay the nationwide injunction issued in the Texas Top Cop Shop case against enforcing the Corporate ...

Type to search articles, cases, and authors. Press ↵ to view all results. This is part of SCOTUSblog’s term in review series, in which scholars analyze some of the most significant cases of the ...

The Supreme Court on Thursday signaled deep uncertainty over how, or whether, to rein in the growing use of nationwide injunctions, a legal tool that has repeatedly stymied President Donald Trump’s ...

The main issue addressed in yesterday's birthright citizenship oral argument before the Supreme Court was whether federal courts should have the power to issue nationwide injunctions against illegal ...

Today's 6-3 Supreme Court decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc. barring nationwide injunctions is a grave mistake. It risks allowing the executive to engage in large-scale violations of constitutional ...

TOPEKA, Kan. (WIBW) - President Trump’s legal team left the United States Supreme Court without a final decision on his order to end birthright citizenship, but they’re still calling it a major win.